当前位置：易读 > 人文社科 > 英美侵权法经典案例教程(英汉对照)_AZW3_MOBI_EPUB_PDF_电子书_王竹 吴震宇 吴至诚
AL123AL123 人文社科 文学 法律

英美侵权法经典案例教程(英汉对照)_AZW3_MOBI_EPUB_PDF_电子书_王竹 吴震宇 吴至诚

内容节选

Section 2. False Imprisonment 84. Whittaker v. Sanford, 110 Me. 77, 85 A. 399 (1912) Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, United States Savage, J. Action for false imprisonment. The plaintiff recovered a verdict for $1100. The case comes up on defendant’s exceptions and motion for a new trial. … …The court instructed the jury that the plaintiff to recover must show that the restraint was physical, and not merely a moral influence, that it must have been actual physical restraint, in the sense that one intentionally locked into a room would be physically restrained, but not necessarily involving physical force upon the person; that it was not necessary that the defendant, or any person by his direction, should lay his hand upon the plaintiff, that if the plaintiff was restrained so that she could not leave the yacht Kingdom by the intentional refusal to furnish transportation as agreed, she not having it in her power to escape otherwise, it would be a physical restraint and unlawful imprisonment. We think the instructions were apt and sufficient. If one should, without right, turn the key in a door, and thereby prevent a person in the room from leaving, it would be the simplest form of unlawful imprisonment. The restraint is physical. The four walls and the locked door are physical impediments to escape. How is it different when one who is in control of a vessel at anchor, within practical rowing distance from the shore, who has agreed that a guest on board shall be free to leave, there being no means to leave except by rowboats, wrongfully refuses the guest the use of a boat? The boat is the key. By refusing the boat he turns the key. The guest is as effectually locked up as if there were walls along the sides of the vessel. The restraint is physical. The impassable sea is the physical barrier.… But the damages awarded seem to us manifestly excessive. The plaintiff, if imprisoned, was by no means in close confinement. She was afforded all the liberties of the yacht. She......

  1. 封面
  3. 编译者简介
  4. 以课育人、以书传趣（代前言）
  5. 目录
  6. 第一章 故意侵权责任
    1. 第一节 意图
      1. 1. Vosburg v. Putney, 80 Wis. 523, 50 N.W. 403 (1891)
      2. 2. Garratt v. Dailey, 46 Wash. 2d 197, 279 P.2d 1091 (1955)
      3. 3. Fowler v Lanning [1959] 1 QB 426
    2. 第二节 接触
      1. 4. Fisher v. Carrousel Motor Hotel, 424 S.W.2d 627 (Tex. 1967)
      2. 5. Leichtman v. WLW Jacor Communications, Inc., 634 N.E.2d 697 (1994)
      3. 6. Wilson v Pringle [1987] QB 237
  7. 第二章 过失侵权责任
    1. 第一节 注意义务：基本规则
      1. 7. Brown v. Kendall, 60 Mass. 292 (1850)
      2. 8. Tubbs v. Argus, 140 Ind. App. 695, 225 N.E.2d 841 (1967)
      3. 9. Rowland v. Christian, 69 Cal. 2d 108, 443 P.2d 561, 70 Cal. Rptr. 97 (1968)
      4. 10. Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562
      5. 11. Caparo Industries plc v Dickman [1990] 2 AC 605
    2. 第二节 义务的违反：注意的标准
      1. 12. Washington v. Louisiana Power and Light Co., 555 So. 2d 1350 (La. 1990)
      2. 13. Weirum v. RKO General, Inc., 15 Cal. 3d 40, 539 P.2d 36, 123 Cal. Rptr. 468 (1975)
      3. 14. Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co., 248 N.Y. 339, 162 N.E. 99 (1928)
      4. 15. United States v. Carroll Towing Co., 159 F.2d 169 (2d Cir. 1947)
      5. 16. Bolton v Stone [1951] AC 850
      6. 17. Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee [1957] 1 WLR 582
  8. 第三章 抗辩事由
    1. 第一节 故意侵权责任中的抗辩事由
      1. 18. O’Brien v. Cunard Steamship Co., 154 Mass. 272, 28 N.E. 266 (1891)
      2. 19. Barton v. Bee Line, Inc., 238 App. Div. 501, 265 N.Y.S. 284 (1933)
      3. 20. Bang v. Charles T. Miller Hospital, 251 Minn. 427, 88 N.W.2d 186 (1958)
      4. 21. Kennedy v. Parrott, 243 N.C. 355, 90 S.E.2d 754 (1956)
      5. 22. Hackbart v. Cincinnati Bengals, Inc., 601 F.2d 516 (10th Cir. 1979)
      6. 23. Chatterton v Gerson [1981] QB 432
      7. 24. Balmain New Ferry Co Ltd v Robertson (1906) 4 CLR 379
      8. 25. Courvoisier v. Raymond, 23 Colo. 113, 47 P. 284 (1896)
      9. 26. Katko v. Briney, 183 N.W.2d 657 (Iowa 1971)
      10. 27. Ashley and Another v Chief Constable of Sussex [2008] UKHL 25, [2008] 1 AC 962
      11. 28. Ploof v. Putnam, 81 Vt. 471, 71 A. 188 (1908)
      12. 29. In Re F (Mental Patient: Sterilisation) [1990] 2 AC 1
    2. 第二节 过失侵权责任中的抗辩事由
      1. 30. Butterfield v Forrester (1809) 11 East 60, 103 ER 926
      2. 31. Davies v Mann (1842) 10 M & W 546, 152 ER 588
      3. 32. Knight v. Jewett, 3 Cal. 4th 296, 834 P.2d 696, 11 Cal. Rptr. 2d 2 (1992)
      4. 33. Jones v Livox Quarries [1952] 2 QB 608
      5. 34. Froom v Butcher [1976] QB 286
      6. 35. Meistrich v. Casino Arena Attractions, Inc., 31 N.J. 44, 155 A.2d 90 (1959)
      7. 36. Morris v Murray [1991] 2 QB 6
  9. 第四章 因果关系
    1. 第一节 事实因果关系或法律因果关系
      1. 37. Hoyt v. Jeffers, 30 Mich. 181 (1874)
      2. 38. Smith v. Rapid Transit Inc., 317 Mass. 469, 58 N.E.2d 754 (1945)
      3. 39. Summers v. Tice, 33 Cal. 2d 80, 199 P.2d 1 (1948)
      4. 40. Ybarra v. Spangard, 25 Cal. 2d 486, 154 P.2d 687 (1944)
      5. 41. Barnett v Chelsea and Kensington Hospital Management Committee [1969] 1 QB 428
      6. 42. Gregg v Scott [2005] UKHL 2, [2005] 2 AC 176
      7. 43. Bonnington Castings Ltd v Wardlaw [1956] AC 613
      8. 44. Fairchild v Glenhaven Funeral Services Ltd [2002] UKHL 22, [2003] 1 AC 32
    2. 第二节 并发因果关系和继发因果关系
      1. 45. Dillon v. Twin State Gas & Electric Co., 85 N.H. 449, 163 A. 111 (1932)
      2. 46. Kingston v. Chicago & N.W. Ry.Co., 191 Wis. 610, 211 N.W. 913 (1927)
      3. 47. Baker v Willoughby [1970] AC 467
  10. 第五章 侵入土地与妨害
    1. 第一节 美国法上的侵入土地与妨害
      1. 48. Peters v. Archambault, 361 Mass. 91, 278 N.E.2d 729 (1972)
      2. 49. Davis v. Georgia-Pacific Corp., 251 Or. 239, 445 P.2d 481 (1968)
      3. 50. Jost v. Dairyland Power Cooperative, 45 Wis. 2d 164, 172 N.W.2d 647 (1969)
      4. 51. Spur Industries, Inc. v. Del E. Webb Development Co., 108 Ariz. 178, 494 P.2d 700 (1972)
    2. 第二节 英国法上的侵入土地与妨害
      1. 52. Graham v Peat (1801) 1 East 244, 102 ER 95
      2. 53. Smith v Stone (1647) Sty 65, 82 ER 533
      3. 54. Cambridge Water Co Ltd v Eastern Counties Leather plc [1994] 2 AC 264
      4. 55. Sedleigh-Denfield v O’Callaghan [1940] AC 880
      5. 56. Hunter v Canary Wharf Ltd [1997] AC 655
  11. 第六章 严格责任
    1. 第一节 共同的起点：Rylands v Fletcher 案
      1. 57. Fletcher v Rylands (1865—66) LR 1 Ex 265
      2. 58. Rylands v Fletcher (1868) L.R. 3 H.L. 330
    2. 第二节 美国法上的发展：异常危险活动
      1. 59. Turner v. Big Lake Oil Co., 128 Tex. 155, 96 S.W.2d 221 (1936)
      2. 60. Siegler v. Kuhlman, 81 Wash. 2d 448, 502 P.2d 1181 (1972)
      3. 61. PSI Energy, Inc. v. Roberts, 829 N.E.2d 943 (Ind. 2005)
    3. 第三节 英国法上的发展：在土地非自然利用中溢出的危险物
      1. 62. Cambridge Water Co Ltd v Eastern Counties Leather Plc [1994] 2 AC 264
      2. 63. Transco Plc v Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council [2003] UKHL 61, [2004] 2 AC 1
  12. 第七章 产品责任
    1. 第一节 美国法：缺陷三分法
      1. 64. MacPherson v. Buick Motor Co., 217 N.Y. 382, 111 N.E. 1050 (1916)
      2. 65. Vandermark v. Ford Motor Co., 391 P.2d 168 (Cal. 1964)
      3. 66. Sheckells v. AGV Corp., 987 F.2d 1532 (11th Cir. 1993)
    2. 第二节 英国法：从过失责任到严格责任
      1. 67. A v National Blood Authority [2001] 3 All ER 289
  13. 第八章 损害赔偿金
    1. 第一节 医疗费用
      1. 68. Williams v. Bright, 230 A.D.2d 548, 658 N.Y.S.2d 910, appeal dismissed, 90 N.Y.2d 935, 686 N.E.2d 1368 (1997)
      2. 69. Coyne v. Campbell, 11 N.Y.2d 372, 183 N.E.2d 891 (1962)
      3. 70. Hunt v Severs [1994] 2 AC 350
    2. 第二节 收入损失
      1. 71. Ruzzi v. Butler Petroleum Company, 527 Pa. 1, 588 A.2d 1 (1991)
      2. 72. Grayson v. Irvmar Realty Corp., 7 A.D.2d 436, 184 N.Y.S.2d 33 (1959)
      3. 73. Pickett v British Rail Engineering Ltd [1980] AC 136
    3. 第三节 非金钱损失
      1. 74. Walters v. Hitchcock, 237 Kan. 31, 697 P.2d 847 (1985)
      2. 75. McDougald v. Garber, 73 N.Y.2d 246, 536 N.E.2d 372 (1989)
      3. 76. H West & Son Ltd v Shephard [1964] AC 326
    4. 第四节 惩罚性或惩戒性损害赔偿金
      1. 77. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Campbell, 123 S. Ct. 1513 (2003)
      2. 78. Rookes v Barnard [1964] AC 1129
      3. 79. Cassell v Broome [1972] AC 1027
      4. 80. Kuddus v Chief Constable of Leicestershire Constabulary [2001] UKHL 29, [2002] 2 AC 122
  14. 第九章 不法侵害尊严与故意致人精神损害
    1. 第一节 威吓
      1. 81. Read v Coker [1853] 13 C.B. 850, 138 ER 1437
      2. 82. Beach v. Hancock, 27 N.H. 223 (1853)
      3. 83. Stephens v Myers (1830) 4 C & P 349, 172 ER 735
    2. 第二节 非法拘禁
      1. 84. Whittaker v. Sanford, 110 Me. 77, 85 A. 399 (1912)
      2. 85. Sindle v. New York City Transit Authority, 33 N.Y.2d 293, 307 N.E.2d 245 (1973)
      3. 86. Bird v Jones (1845) 7 QB 742, 115 ER 668
      4. 87. Davidson v Chief Constable of North Wales and another [1994] 2 All ER 597
    3. 第三节 故意致人精神损害
      1. 88. State Rubbish Collectors Association v. Siliznoff, 38 Cal. 2d 330, 240 P.2d 282 (1952)
      2. 89. Ford v. Revlon, Inc., 153 Ariz. 38, 734 P.2d 580 (1987)
      3. 90. Wainwright v Home Office [2003] UKHL 53, [2004] 2 AC 406
  15. 第十章 诽 谤
    1. 第一节 美国法：宪法性问题
      1. 91. Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc., 418 U.S. 323, 94 S. Ct. 2997, 41 L. Ed. 2d 789 (1974)
      2. 92. Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co., 497 U.S. 1, 110 S. Ct. 2695, 111 L. Ed. 2d 1 (1990)
    2. 第二节 英国法：定义、救济与言论自由
      1. 93. Cassidy v Daily Mirror [1929] 2 KB 331
      2. 94. John v MGN Ltd [1997] QB 586 p 752
      3. 95. Derbyshire County Council v Times Newspapers [1993] AC 534
  16. 第十一章 侵犯隐私
    1. 第一节 美国法上的侵犯隐私之诉
      1. 96. Hamberger v. Eastman, 106 N.H. 107, 206 A.2d 239 (1964)
      2. 97. Shulman v. Group W Productions, Inc., 18 Cal. 4th 200, 955 P.2d 469, 74 Cal. Rptr. 2d 843 (1998)
      3. 98. Godbehere v. Phoenix Newspapers, Inc., 162 Ariz. 335, 783 P.2d 781 (1989)
    2. 第二节 英国法上的侵犯隐私之诉
      1. 99. Wainwright v Home Office [2003] UKHL 53, [2004] 2 AC 406
      2. 100. Campbell v Mirror Group Newspapers Ltd [2004] UKHL 22, [2004] 2 AC 457
  17. Chapter 1. Intentional Torts
    1. Section 1. Intent
      1. 1. Vosburg v. Putney, 80 Wis. 523, 50 N.W. 403 (1891)
      2. 2. Garratt v. Dailey, 46 Wash. 2d 197, 279 P.2d 1091 (1955)
      3. 3. Fowler v Lanning [1959] 1 QB 426
    2. Section 2. Contact
      1. 4. Fisher v. Carrousel Motor Hotel, 424 S.W.2d 627 (Tex. 1967)
      2. 5. Leichtman v. WLW Jacor Communications, Inc., 634 N.E.2d 697 (1994)
      3. 6. Wilson v Pringle [1987] QB 237
  18. Chapter 2. Negligence
    1. Section 1. Duty of Care: Basic Formula
      1. 7. Brown v. Kendall, 60 Mass. 292 (1850)
      2. 8. Tubbs v. Argus, 140 Ind. App. 695, 225 N.E.2d 841 (1967)
      3. 9. Rowland v. Christian, 69 Cal. 2d 108, 443 P.2d 561, 70 Cal. Rptr. 97 (1968)
      4. 10. Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562
      5. 11. Caparo Industries plc v Dickman [1990] 2 AC 605
    2. Section 2. Breach of Duty: Standard of Care
      1. 12. Washington v. Louisiana Power and Light Co., 555 So. 2d 1350 (La. 1990)
      2. 13. Weirum v. RKO General, Inc., 15 Cal. 3d 40, 539 P.2d 36, 123 Cal. Rptr. 468 (1975)
      3. 14. Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co., N.Y. 339, 162 N.E. 99 (1928)
      4. 15. United States v. Carroll Towing Co., 159 F.2d 169 (2d Cir. 1947)
      5. 16. Bolton v Stone [1951] AC 850
      6. 17. Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee [1957] 1 WLR 582
  19. Chapter 3. Defenses
    1. Section 1. Defences in Intentional Torts
      1. 18. O’Brien v. Cunard Steamship Co., 154 Mass. 272, 28 N.E. 266 (1891)
      2. 19. Barton v. Bee Line, Inc., 238 App. Div. 501, 265 N.Y.S. 284 (1933)
      3. 20. Bang v. Charles T. Miller Hospital, 251 Minn. 427, 88 N.W.2d 186 (1958)
      4. 21. Kennedy v. Parrott, 243 N.C. 355, 90 S.E.2d 754 (1956)
      5. 22. Hackbart v. Cincinnati Bengals, Inc., 601 F.2d 516 (10th Cir. 1979)
      6. 23. Chatterton v Gerson [1981] QB 432
      7. 24. Balmain New Ferry Co Ltd v Robertson (1906) 4 CLR 379
      8. 25. Courvoisier v. Raymond, 23 Colo. 113, 47 P. 284 (1896)
      9. 26. Katko v. Briney, 183 N.W.2d 657 (Iowa 1971)
      10. 27. Ashley and Another v Chief Constable of Sussex [2008] UKHL 25, [2008] 1 AC 962
      11. 28. Ploof v. Putnam, 81 Vt. 471, 71 A. 188 (1908)
      12. 29. In Re F (Mental Patient: Sterilisation) [1990] 2 AC 1
    2. Section 2. Defences in Negligence
      1. 30. Butterfield v Forrester (1809) 11 East 60, 103 ER 926
      2. 31. Davies v Mann (1842) 10 M & W 546, 152 ER 588
      3. 32. Knight v. Jewett, 3 Cal. 4th 296, 834 P.2d 696, 11 Cal. Rptr. 2d 2 (1992)
      4. 33. Jones v Livox Quarries [1952] 2 QB 608
      5. 34. Froom v Butcher [1976] QB 286
      6. 35. Meistrich v. Casino Arena Attractions, Inc., 31 N.J. 44, 155 A.2d 90 (1959)
      7. 36. Morris v Murray [1991] 2 QB 6
  20. Chapter 4. Causations
    1. Section 1. Causation: Factual or Legal
      1. 37. Hoyt v. Jeffers, 30 Mich. 181 (1874)
      2. 38. Smith v. Rapid Transit Inc., 317 Mass. 469, 58 N.E.2d 754 (1945)
      3. 39. Summers v. Tice, 33 Cal. 2d 80, 199 P.2d 1 (1948)
      4. 40. Ybarra v. Spangard, 25 Cal. 2d 486, 154 P.2d 687 (1944)
      5. 41. Barnett v Chelsea and Kensington Hospital Management Committee [1969] 1 QB 428
      6. 42. Gregg v Scott [2005] UKHL 2, [2005] 2 AC 176
      7. 43. Bonnington Castings Ltd v Wardlaw [1956] AC 613
      8. 44. Fairchild v Glenhaven Funeral Services Ltd [2002] UKHL 22, [2003] 1 AC 32
    2. Section 2. Concurrent and Sccessive Causation
      1. 45. Dillon v. Twin State Gas & Electric Co., 85 N.H. 449, 163 A. 111 (1932)
      2. 46. Kingston v. Chicago & N.W. Ry.Co., 191 Wis. 610, 211 N.W. 913 (1927)
      3. 47. Baker v Willoughby [1970] AC 467
  21. Chapter 5. Trespass to Land and Nuisance
    1. Section 1. Trespass to Land and Nuisance in US Cases
      1. 48. Peters v. Archambault, 361 Mass. 91, 278 N.E.2d 729 (1972)
      2. 49. Davis v. Georgia-Pacific Corp., 251 Or. 239, 445 P.2d 481 (1968)
      3. 50. Jost v. Dairyland Power Cooperative, 45 Wis. 2d 164, 172 N.W.2d 647 (1969)
      4. 51. Spur Industries, Inc. v. Del E. Webb Development Co., 108 Ariz. 178, 494 P.2d 700 (1972)
    2. Section 2. Trespass to Land and Nuisance in English Cases
      1. 52. Graham v Peat (1801) 1 East 244, 102 ER 95
      2. 53. Smith v Stone (1647) Sty 65, 82 ER 533
      3. 54. Cambridge Water Co Ltd v Eastern Counties Leather plc [1994] 2 AC 264
      4. 55. Sedleigh-Denfield v O’Callaghan [1940] AC 880
      5. 56. Hunter v Canary Wharf Ltd [1997] AC 655
  22. Chapter 6. Strict Liability
    1. Section 1. Common Starting Point: Rylands v Fletcher
      1. 57. Fletcher v Rylands (1865–66) LR 1 Ex 265
      2. 58. Rylands v Fletcher (1868) L.R. 3 H.L. 330
    2. Section 2. Development in US Law: Abnormally Dangerous Activities
      1. 59. Turner v. Big Lake Oil Co., 128 Tex. 155, 96 S.W.2d 221 (1936)
      2. 60. Siegler v. Kuhlman, 81 Wash. 2d 448, 502 P.2d 1181 (1972)
      3. 61. PSI Energy, Inc. v. Roberts, 829 N.E.2d 943 (Ind. 2005)
    3. Section 3. Development in English Law: Escape of Dangerous Things in the Course of Non-natural Use of Land
      1. 62. Cambridge Water Co Ltd v Eastern Counties Leather Plc [1994] 2 AC 264
      2. 63. Transco Plc v Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council [2003] UKHL 61, [2004] 2 AC 1
  23. Chapter 7. Products Liability
    1. Section 1. US Law: A Three-fold Taxonomy of Defect
      1. 64. MacPherson v. Buick Motor Co., 217 N.Y. 382, 111 N.E. 1050 (1916)
      2. 65. Vandermark v. Ford Motor Co., 391 P.2d 168 (Cal. 1964)
      3. 66. Sheckells v. AGV Corp., 987 F.2d 1532 (11th Cir. 1993)
    2. Section 2. English Law: From Negligence to Strict Liability
      1. 67. A v National Blood Authority [2001] 3 All ER 289
  24. Chapter 8. Damages
    1. Section 1. Medical Expenses
      1. 68. Williams v. Bright, 230 A.D.2d 548, 658 N.Y.S.2d 910, appeal dismissed, 90 N.Y.2d 935, 686 N.E.2d 1368 (1997)
      2. 69. Coyne v. Campbell, 11 N.Y.2d 372, 183 N.E.2d 891 (1962)
      3. 70. Hunt v Severs [1994] 2 AC 350
    2. Section 2. Loss of Earnings
      1. 71. Ruzzi v. Butler Petroleum Company, 527 Pa. 1, 588 A.2d 1 (1991)
      2. 72. Grayson v. Irvmar Realty Corp., 7 A.D.2d 436, 184 N.Y.S.2d 33 (1959)
      3. 73. Pickett v British Rail Engineering Ltd [1980] AC 136
    3. Section 3. Non-Pecuniary Losses
      1. 74. Walters v. Hitchcock, 237 Kan. 31, 697 P.2d 847 (1985)
      2. 75. McDougald v. Garber, 73 N.Y.2d 246, 536 N.E.2d 372 (1989)
      3. 76. H West & Son Ltd v Shephard [1964] AC 326
    4. Section 4. Punitive or Exemplary Damages
      1. 77. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Campbell, 123 S. Ct. 1513 (2003)
      2. 78. Rookes v Barnard [1964] AC 1129
      3. 79. Cassell v Broome [1972] AC 1027
      4. 80. Kuddus v Chief Constable of Leicestershire Constabulary [2001] UKHL 29, [2002] 2 AC 122
  25. Chapter 9. Dignitary Wrongs and Intentional Infliction
    1. Section 1. Assault
      1. 81. Read v Coker [1853] 13 C.B. 850, 138 ER 1437
      2. 82. Beach v. Hancock, 27 N.H. 223 (1853)
      3. 83. Stephens v Myers (1830) 4 C & P 349, 172 ER 735
    2. Section 2. False Imprisonment
      1. 84. Whittaker v. Sanford, 110 Me. 77, 85 A. 399 (1912)
      2. 85. Sindle v. New York City Transit Authority, 33 N.Y.2d 293, 307 N.E.2d 245 (1973)
      3. 86. Bird v Jones (1845) 7 QB 742, 115 ER 668
      4. 87. Davidson v Chief Constable of North Wales and another [1994] 2 All ER 597
    3. Section 3. Intentional Infliction of Mental Upset
      1. 88. State Rubbish Collectors Association v. Siliznoff, 38 Cal. 2d 330, 240 P.2d 282 (1952)
      2. 89. Ford v. Revlon, Inc., 153 Ariz. 38, 734 P.2d 580 (1987)
      3. 90. Wainwright v Home Office [2003] UKHL 53, [2004] 2 AC 406
  26. Chapter 10. Defamation
    1. Section 1. US Law: Constitutional Issues
      1. 91. Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc., 418 U.S. 323, 94 S. Ct. 2997, 41 L. Ed. 2d 789 (1974)
      2. 92. Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co., 497 U.S. 1, 110 S. Ct. 2695, 111 L. Ed. 2d 1 (1990)
    2. Section 2. English Law: Definition, Remedies, and Free Speech
      1. 93. Cassidy v Daily Mirror [1929] 2 KB 331
      2. 94. John v MGN Ltd [1997] QB 586 p 752
      3. 95. Derbyshire County Council v Times Newspapers [1993] AC 534
  27. Chapter 11. Invasion of Privacy
    1. Section 1. Invasion of Privacy in US Law
      1. 96. Hamberger v. Eastman, 106 N.H. 107, 206 A.2d 239 (1964)
      2. 97. Shulman v. Group W Productions, Inc., 18 Cal. 4th 200, 955 P.2d 469, 74 Cal. Rptr. 2d 843 (1998)
      3. 98. Godbehere v. Phoenix Newspapers, Inc., 162 Ariz. 335, 783 P.2d 781 (1989)
    2. Section 2. Invasion of Privacy in English Law
      1. 99. Wainwright v Home Office [2003] UKHL 53, [2004] 2 AC 406
      2. 100. Campbell v Mirror Group Newspapers Ltd [2004] UKHL 22, [2004] 2 AC 457
  28. 巨人已逝、巨著长存（代后记）

相关推荐